constance: (Default)
constance ([personal profile] constance) wrote2010-11-03 04:25 pm

(03) Briggs Myers tests

Because I'm mostly an INTJ (I have tested as other types, but this is my most frequent result), I'm pretty much hardwired to like Briggs Myers tests, both taking them and reading over the results. It's science, but the roomy, theoretical kind! It's a system! A lovely, useful, flexible system! Mmm, systems.

Sorry, where was I? Yeah, personality tests. Do you find them rewarding or a waste of time? And who are you?
thalia: photo of Chicago skyline (Default)

[personal profile] thalia 2010-11-03 09:07 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm an INTJ too! And I'm also completely fascinated by pretty much any kind of test there is.
resonant: Ray Kowalski (Due South) (Default)

[personal profile] resonant 2010-11-04 01:39 am (UTC)(link)
When I was envying both your Bread and Jam with Frances lunch plans and your architecture, I should have figured you were an INTJ like me!
soukup: Tiki heads are coming to mug you! Flee! Fleeee! (srs bsns Tiki heads)

[personal profile] soukup 2010-11-04 04:41 am (UTC)(link)
Um. Wow. I've read about these in passing and been skeptical, but I've never taken one before today, and I'm a bit blown away. The description of your type is exactly in line with everything I know about you (which granted is not much, but still it's impressive). And the description of mine (INTP) is all so perfectly true of me that it kind of makes my head spin. The odd thing is that each type's description is so detailed and specific, and none of the others fits for me, or for what I know of you -- only the ones we've scored as.

In other words, just like you, I am reacting to this system exactly as my type's description predicts: I'm fascinated by its shiny subtlety and complexity and I want to poke it and learn all about how it works, even if said knowledge might ultimately not prove useful in any practical way. Now that's spooky. *readies wheelbarrow for another library trip*