![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Gratuitous interactive book post + abuse of adverbs
I feel sure that I've mentioned before that I love to read, right? :D That I have a houseful of books and acquire more on a weekly basis, that I never feel the need to join those book-a-week communities because the idea of not reading/rereading fifty books a year is completely foreign to me, even if I rarely feel comfortable talking about them for fear of trying others' patience.
There are books I like and ones I am indifferent to and a few I simply loathe, but I'm rarely intimidated, once I open the covers, into not finishing. David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest nearly defeated me, though. It's a gigantic book, and it's dense and heavily endnoted, which is fine, except that I read and read without getting pulled in. (In fact, the only thing that kept me reading past, say, page 150, was the knowledge that it's A Certain Friend's favorite book and having started it I felt embarrassed not finishing it, on her account.) I read, I say, and read and read, flipping back and forth between the end notes, getting increasingly annoyed with David Foster Wallace for being so apparently willing to sacrifice everything worthwhile in his novel to his obsessive love for his own voice.
I remember the exact moment when that feeling changed for me, too, when it became clear to me that what I was reading was not so much a young man's thousand-page sploogefest (or do I mean spoogefest?) as what I am thinking is The Great American Novel made manifest. I can't tell you what that scene is without issuing some serious spoilers, but after my epiphany I settled in eagerly; and I am becoming increasingly aware as I read that this is possibly the finest instance of one of my own bulletproof kinks that I will ever see.
(Do you remember bulletproof kinks? Te, I think, is the one who first talked about them in conjunction with fandom. She was referring to porn when she put the term forward, but I think it can be applied in a more general sense, too, to any concept or scenario which will move you unbearably every time you read it (no matter how mediocre its execution).)
My bulletproof kink centers around what I've come to think of as a new and peculiarly American form of tragedy, built around a group of people, all bright and funny and/or quirky, whose primary impetus seems to be engaging, and who fail, utterly or maybe just barely, to engage, almost every time they try. The overshots and undershots and near-misses, everyone terribly, frighteningly isolated and nearly irreparably damaged because of it, which makes the rare connections, when they do come, all the more poignant and dear, and throws the misses into sharp relief.
Okay, I've got off-point here. My points are these:
(1) I am reading Infinite Jest. I am enjoying it very much. If you feel the urge to read, hang in there. It is worth any effort you put into it.
(2) Do you have literary bulletproof kinks? What are they?
There are books I like and ones I am indifferent to and a few I simply loathe, but I'm rarely intimidated, once I open the covers, into not finishing. David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest nearly defeated me, though. It's a gigantic book, and it's dense and heavily endnoted, which is fine, except that I read and read without getting pulled in. (In fact, the only thing that kept me reading past, say, page 150, was the knowledge that it's A Certain Friend's favorite book and having started it I felt embarrassed not finishing it, on her account.) I read, I say, and read and read, flipping back and forth between the end notes, getting increasingly annoyed with David Foster Wallace for being so apparently willing to sacrifice everything worthwhile in his novel to his obsessive love for his own voice.
I remember the exact moment when that feeling changed for me, too, when it became clear to me that what I was reading was not so much a young man's thousand-page sploogefest (or do I mean spoogefest?) as what I am thinking is The Great American Novel made manifest. I can't tell you what that scene is without issuing some serious spoilers, but after my epiphany I settled in eagerly; and I am becoming increasingly aware as I read that this is possibly the finest instance of one of my own bulletproof kinks that I will ever see.
(Do you remember bulletproof kinks? Te, I think, is the one who first talked about them in conjunction with fandom. She was referring to porn when she put the term forward, but I think it can be applied in a more general sense, too, to any concept or scenario which will move you unbearably every time you read it (no matter how mediocre its execution).)
My bulletproof kink centers around what I've come to think of as a new and peculiarly American form of tragedy, built around a group of people, all bright and funny and/or quirky, whose primary impetus seems to be engaging, and who fail, utterly or maybe just barely, to engage, almost every time they try. The overshots and undershots and near-misses, everyone terribly, frighteningly isolated and nearly irreparably damaged because of it, which makes the rare connections, when they do come, all the more poignant and dear, and throws the misses into sharp relief.
Okay, I've got off-point here. My points are these:
(1) I am reading Infinite Jest. I am enjoying it very much. If you feel the urge to read, hang in there. It is worth any effort you put into it.
(2) Do you have literary bulletproof kinks? What are they?
no subject
Also, your bulletproof kink sounds wonderful. I'm trying, but due to my undercaffeinated state, unable, to think of examples of this kink in things that I've read. Can you toss out any popular examples?
One of my bulletproof kink is Great Depression-style "making do"- I cannot resist stories that feature people in hard times, finding ways to stretch resources, pool resources, or invent resources to get by. Not so much the "rags to riches" scenario; I kind of prefer it when life doesn't suddenly become glittery, but maybe just a little less meager.
Another is anything to do with communal living; boarding school, prison, the military, communes, kibbutzim, etc. (My family has teased me my whole life about lining up cots for dolls in grim little rows, and posting rigid bathroom privilege rules.) The dynamic of asserting/maintaining one's individuality in this sort of "everyone gets the same ration" environment is endlessly alluring to me.
no subject
I want examples too, though! I can think of examples of both of your great bulletproof kinks, I think (The Long Winter, or One Flew over the Cuckoo's Nest), but I want to see yours! I am suddenly thinking this might be an excellent way to rec things you love, and ways for me to find new and interesting things to read.
no subject
The Long Winter was one of the "making do" stories I had in mind. I mean, really, you can't get more resourceful than twisting hay into logs till your hands bleed. Other "creative deprivation" all-time favorites are Homecoming, by Cynthia Voigt and A Tree Grows in Brooklyn, both of which I'm sure you're familiar with.
One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest!! I totally forgot about that one. Another favorite is Midnight Express (I grew up on the movie, but the book was good, too), and One More River by Lynn Reid Banks (she rewrote this one and CHANGED it, though, and now I can't find an older, uncorrupted copy), and Back Home, by Michelle Magorian. And OMG, anything Amish, because that hits both the communal/conformity kink AND the victory gardenish home economy kink at the same time. Too bad stories with an Amish setting are scarcer than hen's teeth.
Aiee! Sorry to go on so long! As long as I'm exceeding my word limit, though, I'll mention that I hope you decide to mention more of the books you're reading, because your description of them and the things you notice about literature are really interesting and inspiring. Okay. Done now. :))))
no subject
I read A Tree Grows in Brooklyn as a teenager, and I'm afraid I don't remember too much about it -- I think I still own a copy, though, and I should pick it back up, and of the the others you mention I've only read Homecoming (which you're right, was amazing). Yay for new books to read!
Isn't it fun trying to think of things that fit into these categories for you? I've had fun all weekend thinking of more.
no subject
I like it that you ask such interesting questions.
no subject
no subject
SO! There is something about the Hornblower series that I absolutely loved (maybe another kink: good people trying to make do in strange circumstances); travel literature: Prospero's Cell by Lawrence Durrell, a beautiful account of his life on Corcyra, anything by Paul Theroux, Umberto Eco's The Island of the Day Before I think you'd really love.
no subject
no subject
Literature is actually a little tougher to define. I think of it by genres rather than by plot line. I am fond of almost anything set between the wars, the harder boiled the better. I'm a sucker for crackling dialogue and telling sartorial details; Raymond Chandler owns my heart on these.
I'm also devoted to career girl stories. The Best of Everything, Scruples, even Valley of the Dolls push all my "plucky girl in the big city" buttons. Lately I have been meditating about why I don't think that The Devil Wears Prada and other recent Chick Lit books are really the same, but I haven't formulated enough thoughts for a real post yet. I could watch reruns of That Girl until my eyeballs fall out.
Another genre that often intersects with career girl stories is the group-of-friends joint Bildungsroman. Valley of the Dolls actually falls into this realm, though of course the real doyenne is The Group. In a more modern vein, Lace is a good example with a clever premise, or Loose Change or Braided Lives for a slightly more intellectual angle.
I may be reading in the gutter but I'm looking at the stars.
no subject
I don't talk too much about my particular fanfictional and/or sexual BKs (there's a fair bit of overlap there) these days, either, though I was much more open about them when I'd first found fandom and was delighted by the presence of all those kindred spirits. Anyway, I respect your right to keep yours secret and safe.
Hahaha, what a fine flock of novels you've rounded up! Some I know and some I don't, and a couple, Lace for example, I read so long ago that I only remember the absolutely luridest parts of them. (I do remember Lili very fondly, though.) I'm a big Philip Marlowe fan (I first picked him up when I read S.J. Perelman's parodies long ago, but Chandler is a writer you don't really forget. And I agree that chick lit doesn't belong in the same class as the old standbys as, say, Princess Daisy (my personal Krantz favorite, though I do like Scruples and okay I am tired of italicizing so you'll have to bear with me Mistral's Daughter as well. Thinking about it now, the only explanation I can come up with as to why they ought to be separated is that potboilers or no, the old standbys feel epic and substantial in a way that the chick-lit doesn't. Does that make sense?
I'm rambling here, and so I'll stop. :D This is why I tend to try not to talk too much about books -- I get all incoherent and bugeyed and talk with my arms waving.
no subject
I'm still scratching around for my ideas for a full post, but I'd say the big difference in the Chick Lit gals is that they are so ambivalent and gutless. Krantz's women know what they need to do, how they have to use all the ancient tricks that women have learned over the centuries to get ahead (and that we will, by the way, get to learn at the same time, except how to tie an Hermes scarf like a Frenchwoman, which we must still only imagine). Also, while romance is always part of the happy ending of a Krantz novel, it's not the primary motivator. The women create their own success, and getting a man is just one part of that. You know, like the heroes of regular (male) stories.
Also, Judith Krantz used to write for Vogue. She gets all the lifestyle stuff in exquisite detail. Danielle Steele tells you that things are luxurious; Judith Krantz show you what luxury is and helps you feel like an insider who will be able to recognize it in her own life.
Now tell me more about these Perelman parodies of Chandler. I just stumbled in through Dashiell Hammet. Also, try Cornell Woolrich if you like that stuff.
no subject
Ah, you put it so well, the difference between the girl-in-the-wide-world novels of twenty years ago and today's chick-lit. And I agree that Mistral's Daughter is the best of Krantz's novels, not just epic but moving and thoughtful as well. But I can't help it: I adore Princess Daisy because it was one of the first grown-up novels I ever read by sneaking it out of my mother's bedside table, and I have a special fondness for it, for that reason.
no subject
It didn't take me long to realize that mine actually is a sexual kink that happens to gratify (or intrigue?) me on every level. The Eroticized Rivalry has never yet failed to reel me in. No matter how shitty the execution, this dynamic strikes some chord of need or recognition in me that manages to salvage the story every time. Whether the characters experience an attraction in spite (or perhaps because) of a mutual tension, or simply manage to overcome their dislike long enough to share a moment of communion, I find myself so completely buzzed.
In terms of fandoms, this preference always dictates my ships of choice. Snape/Harry is my HP OTP, I can't get enough Season 2 Starbuck/Tigh action for BSG, and--if I ever got more than peripherally interested in Veronica Mars fanfiction--I would be the first to churn out some naughty and embarassing Veronica/Sheriff Lamb.
no subject
YES. yesyesyesyesyesyesyes.
Re: YES. yesyesyesyesyesyesyes.
Anyway, I am off to remedy my woeful lack of Bond/M fanfic as soon as I finish answering comments.
no subject
no subject
Maybe I'll check out Desk Set on your recommendation. ^_^
no subject
no subject
no subject